The Multiple Code (again)

[hungryghosts]

We discovered a redux of the old Multiple Code over here: https://sites.google.com/view/multiplecode/home?authuser=0 So we decided to make ours. It might get tweaked later, but this is what ours is so far:

MuC N(?#$) | P(nb/q) | A(b r/+/^) | S.(++) | O("no") | M("it's complicated") | W(f~+) | C(cc++ m) | OF(r- o+) | F(#/a/~) | M(~) | R(f/p/qp/r+) | V(-*) | X(q/l/b/ar/as/q) | G(f/m/n/a/o) | J(en) | So(r o++) | R(+)

We have our criticisms (why oh why more -genic terms, ugh) but it was still a fun way to kill an hour.

Comments

[hungryghosts]

What I like is that a lot of these are just "nah" or "we don't know, really" or "a lot, I guess" or "*just shrugs*"

We're plural. That's really all most people need to know.

- Phosphor

[hungryghosts]

I'd be alright with changing the gender/orientation ones to just "queer."

- Lark

[hungryghosts]

Lmao. Nah, I feel like at that point it crosses over into a joke fill. Although if people outvote me...

- Phosphor

[lb_lee]

I like O("no"), that's our feeling about it too. (Also oh god we feel old we have no idea what most those fucking -genic words mean.)

Been meaning to signalboost this, just... pflurrrrgh writeathon owns me.

--Rogan